Integration of Tight Quantifi ers into the System for Checking Consistency of Expert Evaluations
https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7900-2025-23-2-18-28
Abstract
This paper discusses the integration of tight quantifiers into a system for checking the consistency of expert evaluations, significantly enhancing the system’s ability to analyze various scenarios. Existential and universal quantifiers enable the processing of more complex logical expressions, increasing both accuracy and flexibility. This approach allows for consideration of both individual probabilities of factors and their combinations, which is particularly important for solving complex problems related to risk assessment and strategic management. The paper provides a detailed description of consistency-checking algorithms, including graph-based visualization of relationships between expert evaluations and methods for resolving inconsistencies. Additionally, a modular approach to developing a software system for automating expert evaluation analysis is discussed. The proposed system demonstrates high versatility and applicability in risk management, forecasting, and decision-making tasks, making it a valuable tool for improving prediction accuracy and developing more effective management strategies.
About the Author
E. D. MalaevaRussian Federation
Elena D. Malaeva, Student
Novosibirsk
References
1. Kurkina E. P., Shuvalova D. G. Otsenka riska: ekspertnyi metod [Risk assessment: expert method]. Problems of Science, 2017, no. 1 (14), рp. 63–69. (In Russ.)
2. Pavlenko A. V., Kovaleva E. G., Radoutskiy V. Yu. Analiz podkhodov k otsenke riska [Analysis of approaches to risk assessment]. Vestnik BSTU named after V. G. Shukhov, 2015, no. 3, рp. 106–109. (In Russ.)
3. Zhukov M. S., Orlov A. I., Falko S. G. Ekspertnye otsenki v riskakh [Expert evaluations in risks]. Controlling, 2017, no. 66, рp. 24–27. (In Russ.)
4. Orlov A. I. Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie. Chast’ 2. Ekspertnye otsenki [Organizational and economic modeling. Part 2. Expert evaluations]. Moscow, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 2011, 488 p. (In Russ.).
5. Malaeva E. D., Yakhyaeva G. E. Programmnaya sistema vizualizatsii i proverki soglasovannosti otsenochnykh znaniy ekspertov [Software system for visualization and verifi cation of expert evaluative knowledge consistency]. Vestnik NSU. Series: Information Technologies, 2023, vol. 21, no. 1, рp. 32–45. (In Russ.)
6. Yakhyaeva G. Fuzzy model truth values. // Proceedings of the 6-th International Conference Aplimat, February 6-9, 2007, Bratislava, Slovak Republic, рp. 423–431.
7. Yakhyaeva G. E., Yasinskaya O. V. Metody soglasovaniya znaniy po komp’yuternoy bezopasnosti, izvlechennykh iz razlichnykh dokumentov [Methods for aligning knowledge on computer security extracted from various documents]. Vestnik NSU. Series: Information Technologies, 2013, vol. 11, no. 3, рp. 63–73. (In Russ.)
8. Yakhyaeva G., Skokova V. Subjective Expert Evaluations in the Model-Theoretic Representation of Object Domain Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2021, рp. 152–165.
9. Karasev O. I., Kitaev A. E., Mironova I. I., Shinkarenko T. V. Ekspertnye protsedury v forsayte: osobennosti vzaimodeystviya s ekspertami v proyektakh po dolgosrochnomu prognozirovaniyu [Expert procedures in foresight: features of interaction with experts in long-term forecasting projects]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, 2017, no. 2, рp. 169–184. (In Russ.)
10. Dymont N. A., Malaeva E. D., Yakhyaeva G. E. Algoritmy proverki korrektnosti interval’nykh
11. ekspertnykh otsenok [Algorithms for verifying the correctness of interval expert evaluations].
12. Vestnik NSU. Series: Information Technologies, 2024, vol. 22, no. 2. (In Russ.)
13. Ilyin V. A., Kim G. D. Lineynaya algebra i analiticheskaya geometriya [Linear algebra and analytic geometry]. Moscow, Prospekt publ., 2007, 400 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Malaeva E.D. Integration of Tight Quantifi ers into the System for Checking Consistency of Expert Evaluations. Vestnik NSU. Series: Information Technologies. 2025;23(2):18-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7900-2025-23-2-18-28